An apology & redemption – Clairefontaine!
Posted: December 22nd, 2009 | Author: Thomas | Filed under: Ink & stationery, Reviews of all kinds | 4 Comments »On the 7th of December 2008 I received a parcel from Karen Doherty who happens to be the vice president of marketing for .
Inside that parcel was a planner- to be specific it was the “” planner and I said I would review it.
It is now the 22nd of December 2009, over 1 year has passed and still no review- whats my excuse you ask? My right lung collapsed, I stupidly moved continents for a stupid reason and many other events affected my life but excuses wont make amends thus;
The Quo Vadis Notor

The basic specifications
- Daily Planner
- 12 x 17 CM | 4 3/4″ x 6 3/4″
Appearance and size
Its hardbound and pretty slick, the cover is made of and it has a nice feel to it, not tacky at all! It feels reassuringly subtle and comfortable. It is definitely made to be used- hand sewn construction and a very solid feel.
It comes in pretty perfect size, feels substantial without being overwhelming which is my problem with most planners, either too small or too big- with the it felt just about right!
The writing experience
I like wet and bold nibs so the and I initially did not get along, it does not feature the regular paper that I am used to but rather a thinner, less substantial alternative.
The weight of the paper is 64g and I could visually appreciate that fact the moment the tines flexed and the tip of the nib hit the page. Epic bleedthrough, I hasten to add however that this is not a smear against the, my choice of writing instrument is just not suited for the material. If it had super thick Triomphe paper I would not doubt complain about how bulky the was.
The ‘s paper requires the appropriate tool to be utilized against it, I would suggest a gel pens, pencils and if you insist on fountain pens then a western XF or asian F (or thinner of course)! .
Other thoughts
The has impeccable quality, as stated before it really does feel very well put together, the back has a nice sleeve and it contains a plethora of pages with a dazzling amount of options and features amongst the line of information featuring public holidays, your blood type, insurance provider, a diminutive 2010 planner, international telephone access codes and the list goes on! Everything you could possibly want basically. I would have prefered the to come with heavier paper to withstand my usual instruments of choice, that being said I cannot fault for their decision since they had cost, size and weight ratios to adhere to. Overall kudos has to be given to and the /group, a solid 8/10 from me.
Side notes
The photographs I took at the time (last year) happen to be horrendus and while you may simply advise me to retake said photographs unfortunately I cannot since in my mess of a life I seemed to have either misplaced or lost it the planner in question!
Taking into account that its the end of the year, perhaps it is a sign that I should purchase a new? Perhaps the this time!? (74G paper vs 64G!).
Photographs of the can be seen at ‘s review of the very same planner! !
My apologies to Karen once more and I assure you that should you want me to write a review on any further products I shall do with due diligence and a sense of pressing urgency!
A+
I loved using a Journal 21 this year. The paper is great. Beautiful planner, one of the best from Quo Vadis.
I have a Journal 21 on my way from Karen and have no doubt I will fall in love with it!
Yay! I’m not the only one that was this late getting my review done! Granted, I don’t have your very valid reason for the delay…
I was a late addition to the review group and didn’t get my planner until late January 09, so it seemed kinda pointless to post a review well after most people have already purchased their planners. So I waited until earlier this month.
You got awesome loot! and your reason is pretty valid, its nice to spread the reviews out.